Creator: Stanford University
Folding@home is possibly the most successful GPGPU application at the moment, with ATI pioneering GPU-based folding years ago with its Radeon X1000 range of GPUs. Since then, folding has spread to the point where Nvidia has supported folding on all GPUs since its GeForce 8-series.
Folding is a client-based distributed computing application that simulates protein folding to aid our understanding of complex diseases such as Alzheimer's, Mad Cow Disease (BSE), CJD, ALS, Huntington's, Parkinson's disease, and many Cancers and cancer-related syndromes. To add some interest to the furthering of scientific and medical research doesn't hold any interest for you, Stanford also has team- and user-based
leaderboards, so folding is also a competition.
To fold on your GPU, visit the
High Performance Client page and download the latest version. The client downloads work units (aka 'projects') from Stanford, and each work unit is worth a certain amount of points.
You can monitor your folding progress via the
FahMon tool, which will calculate how quickly your card can get through the current work unit and extrapolates a points per day (ppd) figure. You can join the
Custom PC and bit-tech Folding team (currently
ranked fifth in the world) by using the team number 35947. Your contribution is valued.
-
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 512MB
-
Gigabyte GeForce GTS 250 1GB
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 512MB
-
ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB
-
ATI Radeon HD 4770 512MB
-
ATI Radeon HD 4830 512MB
-
5559
-
5439
-
4046
-
2572
-
2299
-
2000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
ppd (as measured through FahMon)
-
ATI Radeon HD 4830 512MB
-
ATI Radeon HD 4770 512MB
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 512MB
-
ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB
-
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 512MB
-
Gigabyte GeForce GTS 250 1GB
Power at socket (W)
The Gigabyte GeForce GTS 250 1GB, just as any GTS 250, is a very capable folder, producing around 5,500 PPD. The reason that the card on test performs slightly worse than the stock GTS 250 is likely due to the slight differences in folding projects and shouldn't be taken as a real difference in performance.
Similarly, the slightly higher folding power consumption of 280W in comparison to 270W for a 512MB GTS 250 is likely down to the differences at the GPU level, as each GPU off a wafer has different characteristics to the next. With that said, it's still comfortably the most thirsty card when folding in this test group.
Want to comment? Please log in.